Here are the key takeaways from Michael Porter's classic Harvard Business Review article, “What Is Strategy?”:
- Operational Effectiveness Is Not Strategy: Being operationally effective means performing similar activities better than rivals. This includes efficiency improvements, better technology use, and process optimization. While crucial, these gains are easily imitated and do not provide lasting competitive advantage.
A company can outperform rivals only if it can establish a difference that it can preserve.
- Strategy Rests on Unique Activities: True strategy is about choosing to perform different activities than competitors, or performing similar activities in distinct ways. It’s about establishing a unique and valuable position that can be sustained over time.
The essence of strategy is choosing to perform activities differently than rivals do.
- Imitation Erodes OE Advantages: Best practices and operational improvements spread quickly across industries. When companies focus solely on OE, competition converges, margins shrink, and no one wins a lasting edge.
Strategic positions can be based on customers’ needs, customers’ accessibility, or the variety of a company’s products or services.
- A Sustainable Strategic Position Requires Trade-offs: A sustainable strategy requires trade-offs—choosing what not to do. Trade-offs protect a strategic position because rivals would have to sacrifice some strengths to imitate it.
Trade-offs are essential to strategy. They create the need for choice and purposefully limit what a company offers.
- Fit Drives Both Competitive Advantage and Sustainability: Strategy involves aligning and reinforcing a system of activities, not just improving individual functions. The way activities “fit” together creates greater and more sustainable value than the sum of isolated improvements.
Fit locks out imitators by creating a chain that is as strong as its strongest link.
- Types of Fit: There are three levels of fit that enhance consistency, reinforce strategy, and optimize effort across the activity system.
- First-order: consistency between activities and the overall strategy
- Second-order: reinforcing activities
- Third-order: optimization of effort across activities
The competitive value of individual activities cannot be separated from the whole.
- Fit and Sustainability: The more tightly integrated and unique your activity system, the harder it is for competitors to replicate. Strategy is more defensible when based on systems, not individual components.
Strategic positions should have a horizon of a decade or more, not of a single planning cycle.
- Rediscovering Strategy: The Failure to Choose: Many companies lose strategic clarity by failing to make hard choices. A misguided focus on OE or reacting to every change often leads to blurred positioning and internal confusion.
- The Growth Trap: Pursuing growth by broadening a company’s activities can blur strategic position and weaken competitive advantage. Staying focused on core strategic choices supports long-term advantage.
- Profitable Growth: Growth that reinforces the existing strategy is possible and desirable. This includes deepening the activity system, expanding in areas where your uniqueness holds, or leveraging complementarities that competitors cannot match.
- The Role of Leadership: Leadership is critical for defining and protecting strategy. Leaders must set direction, make trade-offs clear, align teams around the strategic position, and resist distractions that threaten focus and coherence.
These lessons are particularly relevant for product managers and designers: mastering operational excellence is vital for baseline performance, but real differentiation and success come from smart, unique choices and building coherence across your product, brand, and business model.